The University Grants Commission (UGC) has conferred autonomy upon a number of criminal establishments, which includes 4 national law universities (NLUs).
Among the sixty universities/faculties granted autonomy are National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR), Hyderabad; National Law University, Delhi; National Law University, Odisha; Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law (RGNUL), Patiala; Indian Law Institute (ILI); and OP Jindal Global University, of which Jindal Global Law School (JGLS) bureaucracy apart.
As in keeping with the UGC Guidelines for Autonomous Colleges, 2017, the standards for eligibility consist of the requirement of getting existed for extra than ten years, an ‘A’ grade accreditation by way of the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), less than 10% faculty employed on a contractual foundation, and so forth. Other criteria for granting autonomy include instructional reputation, research achievements of college, first-class and advantage of college students, adequacy of infrastructure, hostel facilities, and so on.
These institutes will now have autonomy over their functioning; they’re empowered with designing their personal guides of study, prescribing regulations for admission, and putting techniques of evaluation and exam regulations.
Additionally, they will acquire financial assistance from the UGC for funding workshops and seminars, furnishings for the workplace and school rooms, library equipment, upkeep, and maintenance now not main to the construction of a new constructing, office device, teaching aids, and guest/touring college, among others.
The amount of grant money can go as much as Rs. 20 lakh, for each undergraduate and postgraduate degree. The identical cannot be used for introduction of posts or for a charge of income to any of the university body of workers.
JGU is one in every of simplest two private universities to be granted autonomy. In an e-mail, Prof C Raj Kumar, Dean of the University said,
“This is the maximum great achievement of JGU considering that its inception on 30th September 2009. On behalf of our Founding Chancellor, Mr. Naveen Jindal, and my personal behalf, I would like to congratulate all the stakeholders of JGU, including the school members, students, staff, alumni, mother and father and indeed the country Government of Haryana, and different government and regulatory our bodies for this outstanding reputation.
It is certainly exceptional that JGU ought to obtain this distinction in slightly 8 years while many universities could take even many years to finish the NAAC accreditation system, not to mention acquire the distinction of the A+ grade…”
With the globalization of the Indian economy and the monetary reforms that followed it, a powerful dispute resolution system is necessitated. Arbitration as an institution in India remains evolving and there are multifold troubles that intrude in the working of a successful arbitration in India. While we’ve numerous small arbitration establishments everywhere in the united states of America, none of them appeal to big arbitrations in India. India would not have prescribed regulations and adequate infrastructure for institutionalized arbitration that international locations like Singapore and Germany do. This dissuades the parties and consequently, there’s an urgent want for the institutionalization of Arbitration in India that would fit global requirements.
The absence of responsibility of arbitrators and the pending cases are key issues coming inside the way of India becoming a primary player within the subject of international arbitration.
The appointment of arbitrators now not necessarily requiring expert know-how, their fees, deadlines, and actions to be taken in case of unethical practices are not being regulated in the country. In addition to these, infrastructure centers and price saving tactics aren’t in place thereby not assuring protection of pleasant standards inside the complaints are different information that contributes to the hesitance of global business disputes no longer choosing India as a venue for settlements.
As Indian courts restrain themselves from interfering with arbitral awards, India does no longer come upon as a jurisdiction which includes an anti-arbitration bias. The Indian marketplace has been very open and welcoming to Non-resident Indians and Foreign Institutional Investors. Thus it’d be favorable for global parties to pick India as the venue of arbitration as the expenditure might be a whole lot lesser inside the context of these groups trying to make investments or set up Special Economic Zones in India.
At gift, business disputes regarding large amounts of cash aren’t arbitrated in India. They exit of India due to which we’re dropping huge quantity of time, cash, human resources, and expertise. Therefore, there’s an urgent want for a group in India which would suit worldwide requirements. There is a need to harmonize the Indian law with the principles on arbitration and conciliation of the prison structures of the sector. Independent establishments have to impart education to specialists so as for them to be competent.
The Committee recommends that the following provisions can be included in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: – Addition of Schedules. A Schedule which might offer for sole arbitration and B Schedule which would provide for institutionalized arbitration may be integrated into the 1996 Act.
The A Schedule to be ruled through Part I of the Act shall cope with sole arbitration. The Committee advocated that humans rendering their services as arbitrators have to be registered as contributors of an expert institution just like the Bar Council of India, the Institute of Chartered Accountants, the Engineers’ Association and so forth and will be ruled by the guidelines of such group.
In order to avoid pendency of cases, the committee opinion ned that the expenses of the arbitrator be withdrawn, or he needs to be blacklisted without an in addition case being allotted to him.
Part IA provides for a statutory independent permanent organization called the Indian Arbitration Commission to be presided over by way of the Chief Justice of India. Its contributors shall be one representative each of the Ministry of Law and the Ministry of Commerce and two representatives of known one hundred forty-five expert our bodies including the Bar Council of India, the Institute of Chartered Accountants, the Engineers’ Association and so on.
The recommendations for granting accreditation to be made public, on the way to make a certain transparency of the accreditation technique.
The B Schedule will be governed via Part IA of the Act and such associated policies to be made public a good way to familiarize the global industrial community and instill confidence in their minds.
