Aside from the Android vs. iPhone debate, the fight between inventory Android and skinned Android is probably the argument Android fans are maximum obsessed with. There were endless articles written and movies made presenting customers proclaiming their love for stock Android and the way they desire all telephones came with as a great deal of a vanilla ROM as feasible.
But Android skins have come an extended way. Sure, five years ago, some Android skins have been so bloated that they changed into smooth to factor to them as the worst examples of abusing the Android platform. But these days, maximum OEMs seem to keep in mind that if a business enterprise messes an excessive amount with Android, customers don’t like that business enterprise’s pores and skin. And if they don’t like the pores and skin, a lot of them received’t purchase the cellphone, custom launchers are darned.
That being said, OEMs have lately made a few splendid errors concerning their Android versions. They’ve made adjustments that now not simplest make the user revel in tons worse than inventory; however, they also don’t make feel from a branding, layout, or functional perspective. We want to focus on some of the one’s examples to with a bit of luck study from their mistakes.
So-called bloatware has always been a hassle on the Android platform. OEM- and provider-branded apps take in an area, drain battery existence, and in most cases cannot be removed or may be turned off without rooting the tool. But having branded apps on a cell phone can make feel. For example, the Samsung Health app on Samsung gadgets is quite useful, particularly if you pair it with a Samsung Gear smartwatch. And a carrier-particular app that gives you quick access to your account and statistics usage is absolutely welcome.
But many OEMs take-ups it way too some distance and upload superfluous apps to their telephones — apps that already include inventory Android. Samsung, Huawei, LG, and Sony, are only a few responsible parties that pre-setup unremovable versions of equal, as or worse than inventory apps. Examples include calendar apps, contacts apps, notes apps, and even the phone dialer. This is completely needless; they’re doing extra work to make matters worse for the person!
We do not want extra apps that do the equal component of the stock apps.
LG takes matters one step similarly into the head-scratching territory and turns off the app drawer by default on its gadgets, even on its most recent release, the LG G6. What might ever possess the agency to assume that what Android customers need is all their apps to seem on domestic displays similar to iOS? Sure, it might make the transition less difficult for users coming from the iPhone to an Android cellphone; however, is LG without a doubt banking its entire branding approach on being a “transition” device?
Huawei was even worse than LG for a long time while it came to the app drawer: not only become there no app drawer by using a default, but there was no manner to deliver it returned without installing a 3rd-birthday party launcher. It wasn’t till Huawei released the Mate 9 in 2016 that the option to show on the app drawer changed into subsequently added (but it’s nonetheless grown to become off via default).
Come on, OEMs! Giving Android a branded sense with a few extra apps is best, but don’t mess with the stock apps. And please, depart the app drawer by myself. The app drawer is a sign a part of the Android enjoy and getting rid of it upsets most people of customers.
The difference between a great notification enjoys and a bad one is now and again the difference among lifestyles and demise — literally. After all, if you pass over a notification about an incoming hurricane or a textual content out of your mother asking where her heart medicinal drug is, that might have tremendous ramifications on your existence.
But if that’s authentic, why do some OEMs make an addiction of messing approximately with how Android notifications paintings?
As an example, Huawei’s notification shade hides lock display notifications when you’ve dropped the coloration. Many people have long gone thru the subsequent steps:
A textual content message notification appears on the lock display screen.
We release the cellphone and draw down the notification color.
After analyzing the textual content message within the shade, we decide we can’t answer it now and depart it alone.
Why could OEM’s regulate Android code to make notifications less effective?
Every Android consumer has probably achieved this as a minimum as soon as. But if you’re on a Huawei phone, you probably know that now that you’ve dropped the notification color, the textual content message notification disappears out of your lock display. Why could Huawei do that? Stock Android leaves the notification at the lock display screen until you simply interact with the notification, so it’s stored in the front-and-middle. By casting off the lock screen notification, Huawei puts users in a position to overlook that the notification remains unanswered.
Beyond that, a few OEM’s alter how a person can have interact with notifications. On Xiaomi devices, to extend notifications in color, you need to use arms instead of one. And in Huawei’s EMUI, you couldn’t make bigger notifications in any respect! Did those companies assume that expandable notifications are something users don’t like? Why put the greater code to adjust this feature when the feature itself by no means needed solving?
Google works tough to make the notifications enjoy an excellent one for customers. For years, notifications had been so much higher on Android than on iOS, to the factor that that fact by myself became a motive now not to exchange. So please, OEMs, don’t mess with the notifications!
Of all the changes an OEM makes with its precise Android skin, none is greater fundamental than the software’s general look and experience. Custom icons, animations, fonts, and extra can make Android seem like a completely different software program in comparison to stock
ow; whether or not you like specific design adjustments is a fairly subjective thing; however, we can all agree that the goal OEMs have with their designs is to boost the brand identification. That’s why, as an instance, stock Android’s wallpapers are minimalist designs, and Samsung’s are typically HD snapshots of environments.
The design of Android pores and skin needs to align with the employer brand, now not going at once in opposition to it.
You can believe our wonder when we discovered that OnePlus offers users the ability to personalize the coloration scheme in their devices in Oxygen OS. However, the agency’s own exclusive pink-coloration branding isn’t always an option. One might think that if you desired to preserve the brand identity congruent inside the device, the color red could be everywhere in the area, like the outside of the Lava Red OnePlus 5T.
But nope, you have given eight coloration choices to subject matter your phone in OxygenOS: conventional Android blue, a lighter color of blue, crimson, a slightly lighter pink, light brown, neon inexperienced, orange, and pink. No crimson to speak of.